Ivermectin Didn’t Save Uttar Pradesh From Covid-19

Many things may have had an impact on the state, but the reduction in Covid-19 cases was clearly not down to ivermectin

Pictured: Stock photo pills. Probably not ivermectin, but you never know. Source: Unsplash

It’s important to note that I’ve never been to Uttar Pradesh right at the start of this article. I’ve spoken to many doctors who work in the state, and have heard some truly devastating things, but all I can speak to personally is the data, so that’s what this piece is about. It’s also worth noting that this piece is based largely on reported numbers for the state, and those figures appear to be quite suspect — it’s possible that the reporting of Covid-19 in Uttar Pradesh is simply so bad that none of the statements made about the state (including those in this article) are true.

In the long, exhausting story of ivermectin for Covid-19, there are many claims being made. Some are simply absurd, like the idea that pharmaceutical companies can’t make money off generic medications (they absolutely can, and do), and some are more interesting and require some thought. However, none of them have quite the staying power of the idea that ivermectin saved Uttar Pradesh, a large Indian state, from the coronavirus. Enter any online conversation about the drug and guaranteed, within minutes, someone will bring up Uttar Pradesh as definitive proof…